Juwai Teer Score Frequency & Statistical Pattern Counter
Paste the results you have recorded and this counts them: every number from 00 to 99 on a frequency grid, house and ending digits broken out, how long since each number last appeared, and — the part that matters — how your figures compare with what pure chance produces over the same number of draws. It is a record-keeping tool. It does not predict anything, and nothing can.
Commas, spaces, tabs and new lines all work as separators. Two-digit numbers from 00 to 99; a single digit like 5 is read as 05. FR and SR labels are picked up automatically, and a date at the start of a line is used for ordering only.
What Is a Juwai Teer Counter?
It is a counting tool for records you already keep. You paste in the Juwai Teer results you have written down, and it tallies them: how many times each number from 00 to 99 appeared, which house and ending digits showed up most, how many draws have passed since each number was last seen, and how your totals compare with what randomness alone would produce over the same number of draws.
That last part is the reason this page is built the way it is. Counting past results is straightforward and mildly useful. The difficulty is that a frequency table looks like it is telling you something about the future, and it is not. So rather than leaving you to draw the wrong conclusion from a correct table, the tool puts the expected figure beside every observed one.
What it does
- Counts every number, including the ones that never appeared. Most counters only list numbers that turned up, which hides the more interesting half of the picture.
- Separates FR and SR. If your records label the rounds, you can count either round on its own or both together.
- Shows the gap. For each number, how many draws have passed since it last appeared, which is the figure most people are actually tracking by hand.
- Breaks out house and ending digits against the 10 percent share each digit would get if all ten were equally likely.
- Tells you whether your pattern is unusual. It calculates, from your own sample size, how likely a result at least as lopsided as yours is by chance alone.
What it does not do
It does not fetch results from anywhere, it is not connected to any Teer committee or archery association, and it does not verify what you typed against any official source. Above all it does not predict, suggest, rank or hint at numbers for a future round. There is no calculation that can do that, and a tool that implies otherwise is selling you something.
How to Use the Juwai Teer Counter
Step 1 — Paste whatever format your records are in
You do not need to tidy anything first. All of these work:
24 56 78 03 45
01/09 FR 24 SR 56
2026-09-01, 24, 56
5 → read as 05
Anything that is not a number between 0 and 99 is ignored, so dates, day names, headings and stray words will not break the count. A date at the start of a line is used only for ordering and labelling.
Step 2 — Choose which round you are counting
If your paste contains FR or SR labels, the round filter becomes available and you can count first round only, second round only, or both. Counting them together is fine for a general tally. Counting them separately is more honest if you are looking for patterns, because the two rounds are separate events and mixing them halves your effective sample for each.
Step 3 — Set the order of your list
The tool assumes your list runs oldest first. If you paste newest first, switch the order toggle, otherwise the "draws since last seen" column will be measured from the wrong end and every gap figure will be wrong.
Step 4 — Read the grid before the table
The 00 to 99 grid is the quickest way to see the shape of your data. Shaded cells appeared, unshaded ones did not, and the darker the shading the more often. What most people notice first is how many cells are blank — and the statistics panel underneath tells you how many blanks to expect.
Step 5 — Read the statistics panel last, and carefully
It compares your numbers with chance. If it says your top number hitting five times is something that happens in most random lists of your size, that is the conclusion, even though the table above it looks like it says otherwise. That panel is the only part of this page that tells you what your data means.
How the Juwai Teer Result Is Counted
The result is not drawn, generated or selected. It comes from counting arrows, which is what makes Teer unusual among number games and worth understanding properly.
The sequence
- Archers assemble and shoot. A group of archers shoots at a cylindrical target made of bundled grass or straw, within a fixed time window and with a set number of arrows each.
- Officials count the arrows in the target. Only arrows that struck and stayed in the target are counted. Arrows that missed or fell out do not count.
- The last two digits become the result. The total is counted and the final two digits are announced as the round's number.
| Arrows counted in the target | Announced result | House | Ending |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,432 | 32 | 3 | 2 |
| 1,405 | 05 | 0 | 5 |
| 1,300 | 00 | 0 | 0 |
| 987 | 87 | 8 | 7 |
Why the outcome cannot carry over
Each round is a fresh count of a fresh set of arrows shot by archers who are not trying to hit a number — they are trying to hit the target. The total is whatever it happens to be that afternoon, and the last two digits of it have no relationship to the last two digits of yesterday's total. There is no mechanism by which one round could influence the next, which is the whole reason a frequency table cannot be read forward.
Juwai Teer First Round and Second Round
Two rounds are held on a playing day, a short interval apart, and each is counted and announced separately. They are commonly written FR and SR.
| Term | What it means | Note for record keeping |
|---|---|---|
| FR | First Round — the earlier of the two counts | Log it with the round label, not just the number |
| SR | Second Round — the later count, a separate shoot | A separate event, not a continuation of FR |
| House | The tens digit of the result | Derived — never record it instead of the full number |
| Ending | The units digit of the result | Also derived from the full number |
Treat them as two separate records
This is the most common record-keeping mistake and it quietly ruins a dataset. FR and SR are independent shoots, and pooling them into one column means you can never separate them again without going back to the source. Log the round every time, even when you intend to count them together — you can always merge later, but you cannot unmerge.
There is also a sample-size consequence. If you have 180 records and they are half FR and half SR, then for FR alone you have 90 draws, not 180. Ninety draws across 100 possible numbers is a very small sample, and the frequency table built from it will look far more dramatic than it is.
Timings and playing days
Round times and which days are played are set by the organising association and can change, including for holidays and weather. This page does not list a schedule, because a stale schedule on a website is actively misleading. The official announcement is the only reliable source for when rounds are held and what the results were.
How to Record Juwai Teer Numbers
A record is only as good as its weakest habit. These are the five things that make the difference between a list you can actually count and one you cannot.
1. Record the date, the round and the number — every time
Three fields, no exceptions. 2026-09-01 FR 24 is complete. 24 is not, because in three months you will not know which day or which round it belonged to, and you will not be able to filter it or check it against anything.
2. Always write two digits
Record 05, not 5. A single-digit entry is ambiguous in a hand-written list and makes column alignment unreadable in a spreadsheet. This counter converts 5 to 05 for you, but the habit is worth keeping in your own records, because the next tool you use might not.
3. Use one date format and never change it
2026-09-01 sorts correctly in every spreadsheet and is unambiguous everywhere. 01/09 is ambiguous between day-month and month-day, and mixing the two in one file produces errors that are almost impossible to spot later. Pick one, ideally the first, and stay with it.
4. Record from the official announcement, not from memory or a forwarded message
Numbers get transposed constantly in messages — 47 becomes 74 with no trace. A record built from second-hand messages is worse than no record, because it looks authoritative while being wrong in ways you will never find. If you missed a day, leave it blank and note that it is missing.
5. Mark gaps rather than closing them
If no round was held, or you simply did not record it, leave a marked gap. Silently closing up missing days makes your "draws since last seen" figures wrong and makes any date-based comparison meaningless.
YYYY-MM-DD FR NN or YYYY-MM-DD SR NN. It pastes into this counter directly, it sorts correctly in any spreadsheet, and it never becomes ambiguous.
Juwai Teer Number History and Tracking
This is where a counter earns its place and also where it most easily misleads. Everything below is about reading a history correctly, which mostly means knowing what a history cannot tell you.
What a frequency history genuinely shows
- Whether your records are complete. If your total count does not match the number of rounds in the period, something is missing.
- Whether a transcription error crept in. A number appearing far more often than anything else is more likely a copy-paste mistake than a real pattern.
- What actually happened. Which is a reasonable thing to want to know, and is the entire honest purpose of a record.
What it cannot show, with the actual numbers
Each round has 100 possible outcomes and each is equally likely, so every number has a 1 in 100 chance. That makes it straightforward to calculate what a purely random history looks like — and the answer surprises most people, because random data is far lumpier than people expect.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Draws recorded | Avg per number | Expected never to appear | Chance of a 4+ number | Chance of a 6+ number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 0.6 | about 55 | 27% | 0.3% |
| 100 | 1.0 | about 37 | 84% | 5% |
| 180 | 1.8 | about 16 | over 99% | 63% |
| 365 | 3.7 | about 3 | over 99% | over 99% |
Calculated from the binomial distribution with a 1 in 100 chance per draw, and reproduced by the tool above on your own data.
Read that table again, because it does the work of this whole page
With 100 recorded draws, about 37 numbers will not have appeared at all. Not because they are cold, or due, or overdue — because 100 draws cannot cover 100 numbers evenly, any more than 100 coin flips give exactly 50 heads. And there is an 84 percent chance that some number has hit four or more times. Whichever number that turns out to be will look remarkable in your table, and it is the most ordinary thing in the dataset.
Every list has a top number and a set of missing numbers. Their existence is guaranteed. Which number fills each role is decided fresh each time, by arrows.
The gambler's fallacy, named plainly
The belief that an outcome which has not occurred recently is more likely to occur soon is called the gambler's fallacy, and it is the single most common error in number tracking of any kind. It feels compelling precisely because randomness produces long absences, and a long absence feels like a debt that must be repaid. It is not. The arrows do not know, and the target does not keep accounts.
How to Use a Digital Juwai Teer Counter
The practical mechanics, and what each part of the output is for.
The 00 to 99 grid
Every possible result in one view, shaded by frequency. Unshaded cells never appeared in your list. The grid is more honest than a frequency table because a table can only list what turned up, which quietly removes the absent numbers from view — and the absent numbers are usually a third or more of the board.
House and ending digit breakdowns
Each digit from 0 to 9 with its count, its share of your draws, and the 10 percent share it would get if all ten were equally likely. This is where people most often see a pattern, because with only ten categories the bars vary visibly even in perfectly random data. A digit at 14 percent across 100 draws is unremarkable.
The frequency table and the gap column
Every number that appeared, how many times, its share, and how many draws have passed since it last appeared. The gap column is the one most hand-trackers keep, and it depends entirely on your list being in the right order — which is why the order toggle exists and why it is worth checking before you read anything.
The statistics panel
Four figures, and it is the only part of the output that interprets rather than reports:
- Average per number — your draw count divided by 100. Everything else is measured against this.
- Numbers never seen, observed and expected — put side by side, which is usually the moment the point lands.
- How likely your top number's run is — the probability that a random list your size contains some number hitting at least that often.
- A plain-language verdict — whether what you are looking at is distinguishable from chance. Nearly always, it is not.
Juwai Teer Counting Examples
Example 1 — a short list, counted by hand
Ten draws. Eight unique numbers. Two of them repeated: 24 twice and 56 twice. Each appearance is 1 ÷ 10 = 10 percent of the list.
House digits: 2, 5, 7, 0, 4, 2, 9, 1, 5, 3 → 2 and 5 appear twice each, the rest once.
Ending digits: 4, 6, 8, 3, 5, 4, 1, 2, 6, 3 → 3, 4 and 6 appear twice each.
Ninety of the hundred possible numbers did not appear. With ten draws that is exactly what you would expect — ten draws cannot cover more than ten numbers. Nothing here means anything beyond "this is what those ten rounds were".
Example 2 — what 100 draws actually looks like
| Times a number appeared | How many numbers did that | Expected by chance |
|---|---|---|
| 0 times | 37 | about 37 |
| 1 time | 37 | about 37 |
| 2 times | 19 | about 18 |
| 3 times | 5 | about 6 |
| 4 times | 2 | about 1.5 |
Two numbers hit four times. In a frequency table sorted by count they sit proudly at the top and look like hot numbers. The right-hand column shows they are exactly what a hundred coin-flips-with-a-hundred-sides produces. The two numbers at the top of a real list would be different numbers, and equally meaningless.
Example 3 — why FR and SR must be counted separately
Pooled: 180 draws, average 1.8 per number, about 16 numbers expected to be missing.
FR alone: 90 draws, average 0.9 per number, about 40 numbers expected to be missing.
SR alone: 90 draws, same again.
The pooled table looks much more settled, and it is describing two different events as though they were one. Whichever way you count, log the round so you can do both.
Example 4 — reading a gap correctly
No. With a 1 in 100 chance per draw, the probability of a specific number not appearing in 63 consecutive draws is 0.9963, which is about 53 percent. A gap that long is more likely than not.
A gap of 200 draws has a probability of about 13 percent, and across all 100 numbers you would expect roughly 13 of them to be sitting on a gap that long at any moment.
The gap column is useful for spotting a transcription error or a missing block of records. It is not a countdown, and the number is not becoming more likely as it grows.
Juwai Teer Counter vs. Manual Counting
Counting by hand is not wrong, and for a short list it is faster than opening a browser. The differences show up at scale and in the kinds of mistakes each method makes.
Counting by hand
- Fine for twenty or thirty entries
- Needs nothing but paper
- You notice each entry as you go, which catches obvious errors
- Miscounts silently on long lists, and you cannot tell
- Almost nobody tallies the numbers that never appeared
- Recounting after adding a week means starting over
- No way to compare a result against chance
Using the counter
- Same effort for 20 entries or 2,000
- Counts all 100 numbers, including the absent ones
- Splits FR and SR without re-sorting anything
- Gap figures computed for every number at once
- Compares your totals against the random baseline
- Depends entirely on what you pasted being correct
- Will not catch a transposed 47 for 74 — only you can
The honest summary
The counter is better at arithmetic and blind to meaning. It cannot tell whether your records are accurate, complete or in the right order — and those three things matter more than the counting does. The counting was never the hard part.
Where it does something a hand count essentially never does is the statistics panel. Nobody sits down with a list of 180 results and works out the binomial probability that some number would hit six times by chance. That calculation is the only part of the output that changes what you should conclude, and it is the part a manual count has no equivalent for.
YYYY-MM-DD FR NN format. Paste it here when you want it counted. The record is yours and portable; the counting is disposable and can be redone any time.
Tips for Using the Counter Correctly
These are about getting an accurate count out of accurate records. None of them is a betting tip, because there is no such thing as a betting tip that a counter can give you.
1. Check the order toggle before you read the gaps
Oldest-first is the default. If your list is newest-first and you leave the toggle alone, every "draws since last seen" figure is measured from the wrong end and will be wrong. Nothing else in the output depends on order, so this is the one setting worth checking every time.
2. Count one period at a time
Do not paste three years in one go and read the result as though it describes the present. Count a month, a quarter or a year as a unit. A long pooled list flattens everything into an average that describes no particular period.
3. Separate the rounds when you are looking at frequency
Pool FR and SR for a simple tally if you like. Separate them the moment you start looking at which numbers came up more often, because a pooled count merges two independent events and makes a small sample look like a large one.
4. Check the total against the calendar
If you recorded 30 days of both rounds you should have 60 entries. If the counter says 57, three are missing, and you should find out which before reading anything else. This one check catches most record-keeping errors.
5. Treat a suspiciously frequent number as an error first
If one number is appearing far more than the statistics panel says is plausible, the most likely explanation by some distance is a duplicated paste or a line copied twice. Check the source before you conclude anything about the number.
6. Read the statistics panel before the frequency table
In that order, deliberately. Reading the table first builds an impression the panel then has to argue you out of, and impressions formed from a sorted table are stubborn. Knowing that the top number in a list your size is expected to have four or five hits makes the table far easier to read accurately.
7. Do not use the output to choose numbers
Stated plainly because it is the whole point. Nothing in this counter — not a hot number, not a cold number, not a long gap, not a digit at 14 percent — carries any information about the next round. The arrows are shot fresh each time. If you use this tool, use it to keep a tidy record of what happened.
Juwai Teer Counter FAQs
No, and no tool can. It counts numbers you have already recorded and nothing more. Each round is a separate archery event, and what a number did last week has no effect on what happens in the next round. The statistics panel on this page exists specifically to show you, with your own data, how ordinary the patterns in it actually are.
FR is the first round and SR is the second round. Two rounds are held each playing day, a short interval apart, and each produces its own two-digit result. They are independent of one another. The counter can keep them separate so you can look at FR alone, SR alone, or both together.
A group of archers shoots a set number of arrows at a target within a fixed time. Officials count how many arrows struck the target, and the last two digits of that total become the result. If 1,432 arrows hit, the result is 32. If 1,405 hit, it is 05. The exact number of archers, arrows and the timing are set locally and can differ between clubs and between Teer centres, so check with the official announcement for the figures that apply where you are.
The house number is the tens digit of the result and the ending number is the units digit. A result of 47 has house 4 and ending 7. The counter breaks both down separately, because many people keep their records that way, and shows each digit against the share you would expect from ten equally likely digits.
Because that is what randomness looks like. With 100 draws spread across 100 possible numbers, you would expect around 37 of them not to appear at all, purely by chance. After 180 draws you would still expect about 16 missing. A number being absent from your records carries no information about whether it is "due" - the counter shows you the expected figure next to your actual one so you can see that for yourself.
Almost certainly not in any meaningful sense. Across 100 draws, there is roughly an 84 percent chance that at least one number hits four or more times through chance alone. Something has to be the top number in every list, and it will usually be several hits ahead of the average. The tool calculates this probability from your own data and tells you where your top number sits.
For record-keeping, any amount is useful. For the frequency table to describe anything stable you want at least a few months, and even then the honest conclusion is usually that the spread is consistent with chance. The counter works from two numbers upward and flags when your sample is too small for the frequency figures to mean much.
Yes. It reads plain lists, lines with FR and SR labels, and lines that start with a date. Dates are used to order and label your entries and are otherwise ignored by the counting. You can paste straight from a notes app or a spreadsheet column without cleaning it first.
No. It is an independent counting tool with no connection to any Teer committee, archery association or results board, and it does not fetch results from anywhere. Everything it shows comes from what you typed. Always confirm the actual results through the official announcement.
No. The parsing and all the arithmetic run in your browser, nothing is uploaded, nothing is stored on a server, and there is no account. Reloading the page clears it. Use the copy button if you want to keep a record of a session.